Daily Reflection
June 21st, 2002
Luis Rodriguez, S.J.
Chaplain, St. Joseph's Hospital
Click here for a photo of and information on this writer.

Friday of the Eleventh Week of Ordinary Time
2 Kings 11:1-4, 9-18, 20
Psalm 132:11, 12, 13-14, 17-18
Matthew 6:19-23
The Memorial of St. Aloysius Gonzaga, S.J.
Romans 12:1-2, 9-17, 21
Psalm 130:1-3
Mark 10:23b-30

For people of the 21st century, and especially for people born and raised in a country ruled by democracy, the very notion of nobility as a social class is quite foreign.  So the fact that Aloysius was born into a noble family and was heir to the family title of nobility may not mean to us as much as the fact that he was born into a wealthy and influential family.  Wealth and clout we do understand.  Why, then, would a young man give up that wealth and influence?  There may not be a valid answer to that question, because “Why?” is a head question, while Aloysius’ answer came from the heart, and we cannot quite address head questions with heart answers.

His answer addressed a deeper heart question: “What, then, will one gain by winning the whole world and forfeiting one’s soul?” [Mt. 16:26]  He really had it made by being the heir to the title of Marquis of Castiglione.  He did not even have to enter the race to come ahead.  Yet the gospel question kept hounding him.  A question that in contemporary and non-scriptural form was answered by author Ann Quindlen in her commencement address at Villanova University, when she recalled the words sent to her by her father on a postcard: “If you win the rat race, you are still a rat.”  In that light, wealth and clout lose their tantalizing attraction.

Today’s gospel, then, is most pertinent: "How hard it is for those who have riches to enter the kingdom of God!”  It sounded astonishing to the Apostles and it still sounds hard to us.  Is something wrong with being rich?  After all, the Patriarchs are portrayed as being immensely rich and their very wealth was seen as a sign of God’s blessing.  No, there is nothing wrong with possessing riches —and riches include our personal giftedness— but rather in being possessed by them, in allowing the tail to wag the dog.  The more wealth and influence we can count on to sustain our sense of self-sufficiency, the harder it is for us to recognize and own our radical self-insufficiency before God.  That is why it is so “hard for those who have riches to enter the kingdom of God.”  The Patriarchs did recognize and own before God their self-insufficiency and, in the midst of their wealth, they remained anawim.  So did Aloysius Gonzaga, the heir to the house of Castiglione.

Click on the link below to send an e-mail response

Collaborative Ministry Office Guestbook