Securities Law - Insider Trading - Beneficial Owner May Use Split-Sale Technique to Reduce Short-Swing Profit Liability as an Insider under Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 - Reliance Electric Co. v. Emerson Electric Co. - 92 S. Ct. 596 (1972)

dc.contributor.authorNorris, William C.en_US
dc.contributor.cuauthorFiroz, Muhammaden_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-12T16:54:13Z
dc.date.available2013-02-12T16:54:13Z
dc.date.issued1972en_US
dc.description.abstractFIRST PARAGRAPH(S)|During 1966 the Emerson Electric Company, respondent, negotiated with the Dodge Manufacturing Company concerning a possible merger. Later that year, Dodge notified Emerson that its board of directors had rejected Emerson's merger proposal. Undeterred, Emerson responded in May of 1967 with a cash tender offer to the Dodge shareholders, offering to purchase up to 550,000 shares of Dodge common stock at $63 per share. Dodge defended by announcing plans to merge with the petitioner, Reliance Electric Company...en_US
dc.description.note1971-1972en_US
dc.description.pages328en_US
dc.description.volume5en_US
dc.identifier.citation5 Creighton L. Rev. 328 (1971-1972)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10504/38707
dc.publisherCreighton University School of Lawen_US
dc.publisher.locationOmaha, Nebraskaen_US
dc.rights.holderCreighton Universityen_US
dc.time.yr1971-1972
dc.titleSecurities Law - Insider Trading - Beneficial Owner May Use Split-Sale Technique to Reduce Short-Swing Profit Liability as an Insider under Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 - Reliance Electric Co. v. Emerson Electric Co. - 92 S. Ct. 596 (1972)en_US
dc.title.workCreighton Law Reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal Article
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
26_5CreightonLRev328(1971-1972).pdf
Size:
796.61 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: