Securities Law - Insider Trading - Beneficial Owner May Use Split-Sale Technique to Reduce Short-Swing Profit Liability as an Insider under Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 - Reliance Electric Co. v. Emerson Electric Co. - 92 S. Ct. 596 (1972)

Norris, William C.

Securities Law - Insider Trading - Beneficial Owner May Use Split-Sale Technique to Reduce Short-Swing Profit Liability as an Insider under Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 - Reliance Electric Co. v. Emerson Electric Co. - 92 S. Ct. 596 (1972)

Files

26_5CreightonLRev328(1971-1972).pdf (796.61 KB)

Authors

Norris, William C.

Issue Date

1972

Volume

5

Type

Journal Article

Abstract

FIRST PARAGRAPH(S)|During 1966 the Emerson Electric Company, respondent, negotiated with the Dodge Manufacturing Company concerning a possible merger. Later that year, Dodge notified Emerson that its board of directors had rejected Emerson's merger proposal. Undeterred, Emerson responded in May of 1967 with a cash tender offer to the Dodge shareholders, offering to purchase up to 550,000 shares of Dodge common stock at $63 per share. Dodge defended by announcing plans to merge with the petitioner, Reliance Electric Company...

Citation

5 Creighton L. Rev. 328 (1971-1972)

Publisher

Creighton University School of Law

URI

http://hdl.handle.net/10504/38707

Collections

Creighton Law Review

Full item page

Securities Law - Insider Trading - Beneficial Owner May Use Split-Sale Technique to Reduce Short-Swing Profit Liability as an Insider under Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 - Reliance Electric Co. v. Emerson Electric Co. - 92 S. Ct. 596 (1972)

Files

Authors

Issue Date

Volume

Issue

Type

Language

Keywords

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

Description

Citation

Publisher

License

Journal

Volume

Issue

URI

PubMed ID

DOI

Identifier

Additional link

ISSN

EISSN

Collections