Interpreting Federal Statutes of Limitations

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Bain, Adam
Colella, Ugo

Issue Date

2004

Volume

37

Issue

Type

Journal Article

Language

Keywords

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

FIRST PARAGRAPH(S)|Determining whether the limitations provision of a federal statute bars a cause of action is not always a simple chronological calculation. Where a plaintiffs action might otherwise be barred as untimely, a court may apply an equitable exception to the limitations period to save the case. Courts often do so without first analyzing whether Congress intended for the exception to apply to the particular federal statute. For example, without any statutory analysis, courts have applied a discovery rule of accrual to many federal statutes of limitations. Under a discovery rule, the time period of the limitations provision does not begin until the plaintiff discovers, or should have discovered, her injury. The United States Supreme Court, in a series of recent cases, has held that there must be a basis for inferring Congressional intent to incorporate an equitable exception, including the discovery rule of accrual, into a federal statute. The Court, however, has not articulated a comprehensive interpretive approach for determining when Congress intends to include (or exclude) equitable considerations in a statute of limitations...

Description

Citation

37 Creighton L. Rev. 493 (2003-2004)

Publisher

Creighton University School of Law

License

Journal

Volume

Issue

PubMed ID

DOI

Identifier

Additional link

ISSN

EISSN