Constitutional Law - Due Process - The Punitive Restraints of a Detainer May Not Be Continued When the Requesting State Fails to Hold a Parole Revocation Hearing - Cooper v. Lockhart 489 F.2d 308 (8th Cir. 1973)

dc.contributor.authorArnold, Janet E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-12T22:11:32Z
dc.date.available2013-02-12T22:11:32Z
dc.date.issued1974
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION|In Cooper v. Lockhart, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit addressed itself to an important issue in the field of corrections. The case involved an individual incarcerated in the Arkansas State Prison who was wanted for a parole revocation hearing in another jurisdiction. As is customary, the state seeking revocation requested that a detainer be lodged against the inmate by the Arkansas prison authorities. As a result of the detainer, several punitive restrictions (e.g., ineligibility to participate in vocational training, work-release or furlough programs) were also placed upon the prisoner while confined. The issue was whether such punitive consequences could be continued, when the state seeking parole revocation refused to hold a hearing prior to the prisoner's release from Arkansas custody. The court determined that the continuance of the punitive restraints under such circumstances denied the inmate due process protections of the fourteenth amendment. Originally the actions of two inmates, Leroy Cooper and Harry Williams, were consolidated. Cooper was paroled by the State of Missouri in 1970 after he had served part of a five-year sentence. Following parole he was convicted of a felony in Arkansas and incarcerated in that state's prison. On March 16, 1971, a detainer was lodged in favor of Missouri, which had issued a parole violation...en_US
dc.description.note1973-1974en_US
dc.description.pages575en_US
dc.description.volume7
dc.identifier.citation7 Creighton L. Rev. 575 (1973-1974)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10504/38778
dc.publisherCreighton University School of Lawen_US
dc.publisher.locationOmaha, Nebraskaen_US
dc.rights.holderCreighton Universityen_US
dc.time.yr1973-1974
dc.titleConstitutional Law - Due Process - The Punitive Restraints of a Detainer May Not Be Continued When the Requesting State Fails to Hold a Parole Revocation Hearing - Cooper v. Lockhart 489 F.2d 308 (8th Cir. 1973)en_US
dc.title.workCreighton Law Reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal Article
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
31_7CreightonLRev575(1973-1974).pdf
Size:
840.44 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: