Leaving the Reservation: The Eighth Circuit Eliminates Tribal Court Subject Matter Jurisdiction over Suits between Nonmembers in A-1 Contractors v. Strate

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Igou, Jeffrey M.

Issue Date

1997

Type

Journal Article

Language

Keywords

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

INTRODUCTION|In three opinions written by Chief Justice John Marshall between 1823 and 1832, the United States Supreme Court gave voice to the principles that have defined and governed the legal status of American Indian tribes. In these opinions, Chief Justice Marshall envisioned the tribes as having characteristics similar to those of a state and constituting distinct political organizations capable of self-government. This view of tribal autonomy gave rise to the doctrine of inherent sovereignty - the notion that Indian tribes had sovereignty over the geographical territory they occupied. However, later Supreme Court opinions, while continuing to recognize a geographical component to tribal sovereignty, have rejected tribal authority based exclusively on geographical territory. Instead, the Court has adopted a view of sovereignty based on membership in the political entity known as the tribe...

Description

Citation

30 Creighton L. Rev. 865 (1996-1997)

Publisher

Creighton University School of Law

License

Journal

Volume

Issue

PubMed ID

DOI

ISSN

EISSN