The Three Theologies of Murray v. Curlett: Atheism, Constitutionalism, and Christianity in American Postwar Culture

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Aiello, Thomas

Issue Date

2024

Volume

25

Issue

Type

Journal Article

Language

Keywords

Madalyn Murray , Atheism , Supreme Court , Education , Race , Communism

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

Murray v. Curlett, decided in conjunction with School District of Abington Township v. Schempp, removed the Lord’s Prayer and Bible reading from public schools in 1963. The prevailing national discourse that emerged during the following school year represented a relatively united organization against the ruling, based primarily on moral, rather than legal, grounds. The Supreme Court’s verdict became a target of public outrage, the narrative opposing the Court’s Murray decision creating its own theology, one that tied religious faith to a civic and patriotic idealism disconnected from the teachings of the leader in whose name they so often prayed. In the process, pundits posed American constitutionalism as its own form of theological dogma, one with similar flawed readings of the text upon which the improvised faith tradition was based. Those dogmas were posed against atheism, presented as its own theology, one that also came incumbent with a secular governmental corollary in the form of communism. The battle between atheism, constitutionalism, and Christianity would shape the narrative that would continue to influence public opinion and policy through the rest of the century.

Description

Citation

Publisher

Rabbi Myer and Dorothy Kripke Center, Creighton University

Journal

Volume

Issue

PubMed ID

DOI

Identifier

ISSN

1941-8450

EISSN