Fifth Amendment Takings: A More Conservative Stand on Land Use Policies

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Reinmiller, David H.

Issue Date

1988

Volume

21

Issue

Type

Journal Article

Language

Keywords

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

INTRODUCTION|In three cases decided late in the October 1986 Term, the United States Supreme Court effectively changed the adjudication of takings claims under the just compensation clause of the fifth amendment. In Keystone Bituminous Coal Association v. DeBenedictis and Nollan v. California Coastal Commission the Court raised the level of scrutiny to which challenged government acts are subjected in determining whether those acts are in fact takings of private property for public use without just compensation. In First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los Angeles the Court held that just compensation is required under the fifth amendment where government land use regulations have effected a temporary taking of private property, just as it is required for permanent takings under the state's eminent domain power...

Description

Citation

21 Creighton L. Rev. 213 (1987-1988)

Publisher

Creighton University School of Law

License

Journal

Volume

Issue

PubMed ID

DOI

Identifier

Additional link

ISSN

EISSN