Defining misprescribing to inform prescription opioid policy
No Thumbnail Available
Authors
Dineen, Kelly K.
Issue Date
2018
Type
Magazine Article
Language
Keywords
Alternative Title
Abstract
The lack of shared definitions around opioid misprescribing is problematic for formulating and evaluating opioid policy. For example, the variant definitions of “misuse,” “abuse,” and “addiction” complicate estimates of morbidity. Reported rates of misuse and iatrogenic addiction for patients on opioids range from 1 percent to 40 percent. There are also no widely accepted definitions of misprescribing and overprescribing. The many medical articles on overprescribing address different problems with different policy solutions: prescribing too early or too often, reflexive opioid prescribing post-operatively, and continued prescribing despite evidence that risks outweigh benefits. Even the most carefully written policies rarely define “overprescribing” or “misprescribing.” I offer here a modest attempt at the categorization of misprescribing.
Description
Citation
Kelly K. Dineen, Defining Misprescribing to Inform Prescription Opioid Policy, Hastings Ctr. Rep., Jul./Aug. 2018, at 5.