There May or May Not Be Blood: Why the Eighth Amendment Prohibition against Executing the Insane Requires a Definitive Standard

dc.contributor.authorStark, Robert A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-18T16:50:33Z
dc.date.available2013-02-18T16:50:33Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.date.year2008en_US
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION|The finality of the death penalty engenders a unique sense of urgency to determine when the death penalty should actually be carried out. As such, the groups of prisoners of whom the Eighth Amendment forbids execution are generally well-defined. The United States Supreme Court, in Ford v. Wainwight, determined that the Eighth Amendment precludes states from executing insane prisoners. However, the Supreme Court avoided defining insanity or setting the specific parameters of the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against execution of the insane. This refusal has increased the likelihood of arbitrary administration of the death penalty because it prevents predictability. The lack of a uniform definition of insanity turns sentencing into a deadly game of chance...en_US
dc.description.pages763en_US
dc.description.volume41en_US
dc.identifier.citation41 Creighton L. Rev. 763 (2008)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10504/40625
dc.publisherCreighton University School of Lawen_US
dc.publisher.locationOmaha, Nebraskaen_US
dc.rights.holderCreighton Universityen_US
dc.time.yr2008
dc.titleThere May or May Not Be Blood: Why the Eighth Amendment Prohibition against Executing the Insane Requires a Definitive Standarden_US
dc.title.workCreighton Law Reviewen_US
dc.typeJournal Article
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
31_41CreightonLRev763(2008).pdf
Size:
2.45 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: