James Joyce's Disengagement from Philosophical and Religious Systems

dc.contributor.advisorCorbett, Edward P.J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSundermeier, Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.cuauthorSundermeier, Michaelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-08T22:56:44Z
dc.date.available2017-02-08T22:56:44Z
dc.date.issued1963en_US
dc.degree.disciplineEnglish (graduate program)en_US
dc.degree.grantorGraduate Schoolen_US
dc.degree.levelMA (Master of Arts)en_US
dc.degree.nameM.A. in Englishen_US
dc.description.abstractJoyce's art Is based upon no particular philosophic or theological system; rather, it is based upon the premise that system, a product of the finite mind, is imposed upon rather than intrinsic to infinite reality and that, therefore, reality cannot be fully comprehended systematically. As an artist, he answers this problem by regarding all systems as partially valid but necessarily defective views of reality and, consequently, by adopting a synthetic approach to systems of reality. He is not eclectic because he does not attempt to judge what particular aspect of a given system has the most validity; such an action would imply a priori qualitative knowledge of reality. Rather, he presents reality under a variety of systematic aspects and invites the reader to observe the correspondences among the various systems. The correspondences in Joyce's works symbolize reality — epiphanize it, to use Joyce's own word — they do not explain it. There is no suggestion in his work that he intends anyone to regard simple correspondence as a proof of a given assertion; It seems that, on the contrary, he regards his approach to reality as Just as limited an approach to the infinity of reality as any system is — because there can be no close correspondence between the finite mind and the infinite reality — but that he also regards his approach as an essentially personal thing, one mind’s view of reality, which cannot exist in the mind of another, since the relationships would then be different, and therefore not subject to objective criticism as a philosophical system. What it all reduces to is that any view of reality is subjective! that man views reality from his standpoint alone; and that he who attempts to view reality from as many points as possible stands a better chance of achieving a more extensive view of reality — not comprehensive because of the disparity between the finite and the infinite — than he who adheres to a system.en_US
dc.description.noteProQuest Traditional Publishing Optionen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10504/109428
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCreighton Universityen_US
dc.publisher.locationOmaha, Nebraskaen_US
dc.rightsA non-exclusive distribution right is granted to Creighton University and to ProQuest following the publishing model selected above.en_US
dc.titleJames Joyce's Disengagement from Philosophical and Religious Systemsen_US
dc.typeThesis
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sundermeier-1963-MA.pdf
Size:
32.11 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: