Revisiting Rhode Island v. Innis: Offering a New Interpretation of the Interrogation Test
Loading...
Authors
Helderman, Alexander S.
Issue Date
2000
Volume
33
Issue
4
Type
Journal Article
Language
Keywords
Alternative Title
Abstract
FIRST PARAGRAPH(S)|In Miranda v. Arizona, the United States Supreme Court held that "the prosecution may not use statements, whether exculpatory or inculpatory, stemming from custodial interrogation of the defendant unless it demonstrates the use of procedural safeguards effective to secure the privilege against self-incrimination." The Miranda Court failed, however, to define "interrogation." Almost twenty years later, the Supreme Court in Rhode Island v. Innis "addressed for the first time the meaning of 'interrogation under Miranda v. Arizona"...
Description
Citation
33 Creighton L. Rev. 729 (1999-2000)
Publisher
Creighton University School of Law