Proctor v. Vishay Intertechnology, Inc.: The Ninth Circuit Failed to Follow the Rule of Unanimity When Applying Rule 11 to a Case with Multiple Defendants

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Kotlik, Kathryn A.

Issue Date

2011

Volume

44

Issue

Type

Journal Article

Language

Keywords

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

INTRODUCTION|Since 1900, federal courts have consistently held that all defendants must join in the removal of an action from state to federal court. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441, a defendant or defendants may remove a state action, to a federal district court where the federal district court would have original jurisdiction of the action. When the action involves more than one defendant, the removal is subject to the rule of unanimity. The rule of unanimity is a common-law rule that requires all defendants join in the removal of the action. The rule is derived from 28 U.S.C. § 1446 which outlines the procedural requirements for removal. However, § 1446 does not prescribe how co-defendants in multiple-defendant cases must join in the removal. Although the rule of unanimity is well-settled, federal courts have disagreed over the ways defendants may satisfy the rule...

Description

Citation

44 Creighton L. Rev. 261 (2010-2011)

Publisher

Creighton University School of Law

License

Journal

Volume

Issue

PubMed ID

DOI

Identifier

Additional link

ISSN

EISSN