To Punish or to Remedy - That is the Constitutional Question: Double Jeopardy Confusion in State v. Hansen

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Allen, Daniel A.

Issue Date

1997

Volume

30

Issue

Type

Journal Article

Language

Keywords

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

INTRODUCTION|The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution states, "[Nlor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb." In United States v. Halper, the United States Supreme Court developed a test to determine the Double Jeopardy Clause's scope of protection.|[I]t follows that a civil sanction that cannot fairly be said solely to serve a remedial purpose, but rather can only be explained as also serving either retributive or deterrent purposes, is punishment, as we have come to understand the term.... We therefore hold that under the Double Jeopardy Clause a defendant who already has been punished in a criminal prosecution may not be subjected to an additional civil sanction to the extent that the second sanction may not fairly be characterized as remedial, but only as a deterrent or retribution...

Description

Citation

30 Creighton L. Rev. 235 (1996-1997)

Publisher

Creighton University School of Law

License

Journal

Volume

Issue

PubMed ID

DOI

Identifier

Additional link

ISSN

EISSN