Antitrust II - McDonald v. Johnson (and) Johnson: Standing in Private Antitrust Litigation

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Murphy, Mary Jo

Issue Date

1984

Volume

17

Issue

Type

Journal Article

Language

Keywords

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

INTRODUCTION|Standing to sue in antitrust cases is based on section of the Clayton Antitrust Act. That section provides in part that "any person who shall be injured in his business or property by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws may sue therefore in any district court of the United States. . .and shall recover threefold the damages by him sustained ...." A literal reading of this statute is broad enough to encompass every harm that can be attributed directly or indirectly to the consequences of an antitrust violation. Consequently, the circuit courts have attempted to articulate a precise test to determine whether a party injured by an antitrust violation may recover treble damages. Some courts have focused on tests concerning the directness of the injury involved. Other courts look at the area of the economy the antitrust violation was aimed at, and still other courts have adopted variations of the foregoing. |The Supreme Court of the United States has recently developed a standard to provide uniformity in deciding this issue...

Description

Citation

17 Creighton L. Rev. 1187 (1983-1984)

Publisher

Creighton University School of Law

License

Journal

Volume

Issue

PubMed ID

DOI

Identifier

Additional link

ISSN

EISSN