Fleming v. Asbill: South Carolina Guardian Ad Litem Not Immune from Civil Liability

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

McIntyre, Holly Marie

Issue Date

1996

Volume

29

Issue

Type

Journal Article

Language

Keywords

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

INTRODUCTION|With increasing regularity, family courts have been appointing guardians ad litem for children involved in custody disputes. In child custody cases, a court appoints a guardian ad litem by "statute, rule, or law with the right, obligation and duty to make recommendations concerning the best interest of the children to the court." With the increase in the appointment of guardians ad litem in custody cases, federal courts have been confronted with a growing number of lawsuits brought against guardians for deprivation of civil rights under Title 42 of the United States Code section 1983 ("section 1983"). Additionally, federal and state courts have been increasingly confronted with actions at common law for negligence. Commonly, the guardians ad litem defend the section 1983 and common law claims by asserting immunity. The majority of federal and state courts have held that guardians ad litem are absolutely immune from liability in their role as quasi-judicial officers...

Description

Citation

29 Creighton L. Rev. 1711 (1995-1996)

Publisher

Creighton University School of Law

License

Journal

Volume

Issue

PubMed ID

DOI

Identifier

Additional link

ISSN

EISSN