To Enhance or Not to Enhance: A Guide to Uniformity in Applying Perjury Enhancements under Section 3C1.1 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines: United States v. Dunnigan

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Kelley, Kevin J.

Issue Date

1994

Volume

27

Issue

Type

Journal Article

Language

Keywords

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

INTRODUCTION|United States Sentencing Guidelines ("Guidelines") section 3C1.1 provides for the enhancement of a defendant's sentence if it is determined that the defendant has obstructed or impeded the administration of justice by committing perjury ("perjury enhancement"). The inconsistent application of the perjury enhancement is partly attributable to the failure of the United States Sentencing Commission to provide within the Guidelines specific guidance to the courts. Additionally, courts have inconsistently applied the perjury enhancement because of the potential burden the enhancement imposes on a defendant's right to testify. The perjury enhancement potentially burdens the defendant's right to testify because the possibility exists that a defendant who testifies on her own behalf may be given the perjury enhancement if subsequently found guilty. In light of the sentence enhancement, the defendant might decide that testifying is not worth the risk...

Description

Citation

27 Creighton L. Rev. 585 (1993-1994)

Publisher

Creighton University School of Law

License

Journal

Volume

Issue

PubMed ID

DOI

Identifier

Additional link

ISSN

EISSN