Siefert v. Alexander: The Seventh Circuit Erroneously Found the Endorsement Clause Constitutional in an Effort to Confront the Ethical Dilemmas of Judicial Elections

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Moss, Tyler J.

Issue Date

2012

Volume

45

Issue

Type

Journal Article

Language

Keywords

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

INTRODUCTION|In Siefert v. Alexander, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that John Siefert, a Wisconsin County Circuit Court judge, was prohibited from publicly endorsing other political candidates during his judicial campaign. The Seventh Circuit prohibited Siefert from endorsing political candidates by determining that Wisconsin's Endorsement Clause, a code of judicial ethics that banned judicial candidates from endorsing other candidates during elections, was constitutional. Instead of applying strict scrutiny, the level of review established in Republican Party of Minnesota v. White (White 1), the Seventh Circuit determined the Endorsement Clause was constitutional by applying the Pickering v. Board of Education balancing test for the first time to judicial elections and judges' First Amendment rights...

Description

Citation

45 Creighton L. Rev. 893 (2011-2012)

Publisher

Creighton University School of Law

License

Journal

Volume

Issue

PubMed ID

DOI

Identifier

Additional link

ISSN

EISSN