Effective Indigent Criminal Defense Services in Nebraska State Courts

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Hornstein, Bennett G.

Issue Date

1974

Volume

7

Issue

Type

Journal Article

Language

Keywords

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

INTRODUCTION|Nineteen seventy-three marks the tenth anniversary of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Gideon v. Wainwright, interpreting the sixth amendment's right to counsel to require state provision of free counsel for all indigents accused of serious criminal offenses. This year also marks the first anniversary of Arger-singer v. Hamlin, extending Gideon by forbidding the imposition of jail sentences on any indigent defendant who has not been afforded the right to counsel. Although Gideon enjoined upon the states perhaps the heaviest burdens of any decision of the "Criminal Law Revolution, it has been, paradoxically, one of the most popular rulings of this period. While mandating to the states the considerable obligation of offering free defense counsel, the Supreme Court in no way specified what methods of providing counsel might satisfy constitutional standards. Defense counsel must, of course, meet the minimum requirements of effectiveness in any given criminal case. It is equally apparent that the manner by which a state chooses to provide indigent defense counsel could result in eventual court determinations of the ineffectiveness of counsel so provided...

Description

Citation

7 Creighton L. Rev. 1 (1973-1974)

Publisher

Creighton University School of Law

License

Journal

Volume

Issue

PubMed ID

DOI

Identifier

Additional link

ISSN

EISSN