Constitutional Law - All the Process that Is Due: The Procedures Required before Termination of a Constitutionally Protected Property Interest in Employment

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Newsum, C. T.

Issue Date

1986

Volume

19

Issue

Type

Journal Article

Language

Keywords

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

INTRODUCTION|The fourteenth amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees that no state shall deprive any person of life, liberty or property without due process of law. For over a century, the central meaning of procedural due process has been that parties whose rights are to be affected by state action are entitled to an opportunity to be heard. Moreover, this doctrine has been extended to require notice and an opportunity to be heard at a "meaningful time" and in a "meaningful manner." While the cases in the procedural due process area are numerous, the path to be charted has not always been clear. Since the inception of this doctrine, the Supreme Court has struggled to define the contours of notice and hearing. In its latest decision, Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, the Court declared that a government employee, who has a protected property interest in continued employment, is entitled to a pretermination hearing prior to administrative termination of employment. The purpose of this Note is threefold. First, this Note examines the Supreme Court's development of a bifurcated due process analysis. Second, it discusses the consistency between the Loudermill holding and earlier decisions. Finally, this Note reviews some remaining questions regarding procedural due process and its application which remain unaddressed by the Loudermill Court...

Description

Citation

19 Creighton L. Rev. 77 (1985-1986)

Publisher

Creighton University School of Law

License

Journal

Volume

Issue

PubMed ID

DOI

Identifier

Additional link

ISSN

EISSN