Torts - Supreme Court Review

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Issue Date

1979

Volume

12

Issue

Type

Journal Article

Language

Keywords

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

FIRST PARAGRAPH(S)|The Nebraska Supreme Court addressed itself to a myriad of issues in the past year, approaching some areas left untouched for more than a decade. Its analysis, however, was strongly influenced by its own precedent.|In Richardson & Gillespie v. State, the supreme court held that the state of Nebraska has a duty to exercise reasonable care in the construction and repair of its highways; such a duty extends also to and includes the shoulders of the highway. The supreme court vacated the lower court's dismissal; the district court had ruled that the State's duty to exercise due care in the repair of its highways did not include the shoulders of those highways. The court's ruling in Richardson overruled Farmers Co-op Co. v. County of Dodge...

Description

Citation

12 Creighton L. Rev. 416 (1978-1979)

Publisher

Creighton University School of Law

License

Journal

Volume

Issue

PubMed ID

DOI

Identifier

Additional link

ISSN

EISSN