To Create a Duty or Not to Create a Duty: Nebraska Law Should Adopt Section 37 of the Restatement (Third) of Torts

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Stenzel, Carla

Issue Date

2015-12

Volume

49

Issue

1

Type

Journal Article

Language

Keywords

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

INTRODUCTION|In A. W. v. Lancaster County School District 0001, the Supreme Court of Nebraska adopted the state's new duty analysis for negligence cases. Since its adoption, no Nebraska court has distinctively conducted an analysis to determine whether a defendant owes a duty to a plaintiff if the defendant took no actions that affected the plaintiff and did not have an affirmative duty to act in regard to the situation. The Restatement (Third) of Torts ("Restatement") clarifies that there is a difference between simply failing to prevent harm...

Description

Citation

Publisher

Creighton University School of Law

License

Journal

Volume

Issue

PubMed ID

DOI

Identifier

Additional link

ISSN

EISSN