Circumstantial evidence in Nebraska
Loading...
Authors
Fenner, G. Michael
Issue Date
1986
Type
Journal Article
Language
Keywords
Alternative Title
Abstract
Historically there were four lines of Nebraska cases regarding the value of circumstantial evidence. They proceeded along parallel tracks, oblivious to each other. This article traces the history of the four lines and comes to this conclusion: When judged by the words used to explain it, each line is inconsistent with each of the other three. When judged by how each is applied, the results from each line are almost entirely consistent. This article uncovers and discusses each line of cases, identifies the correct line, and suggests what should be done next.
Description
Citation
G. Michael Fenner, Circumstantial Evidence in Nebraska, 19 Creighton L. Rev. 236 (1986).
Publisher
License
Journal
Volume
Issue
PubMed ID
DOI
ISSN
0011-1155
2168-9261
2168-9261