Circumstantial evidence in Nebraska

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Fenner, G. Michael

Issue Date

1986

Type

Journal Article

Language

Keywords

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

Historically there were four lines of Nebraska cases regarding the value of circumstantial evidence. They proceeded along parallel tracks, oblivious to each other. This article traces the history of the four lines and comes to this conclusion: When judged by the words used to explain it, each line is inconsistent with each of the other three. When judged by how each is applied, the results from each line are almost entirely consistent. This article uncovers and discusses each line of cases, identifies the correct line, and suggests what should be done next.

Description

Citation

G. Michael Fenner, Circumstantial Evidence in Nebraska, 19 Creighton L. Rev. 236 (1986).

Publisher

License

Journal

Volume

Issue

PubMed ID

DOI

ISSN

0011-1155
2168-9261

EISSN