Conflicting Interpretations of the One-Year Requirement on Motions to Confirm Arbitration Awards

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Elliott, Teresa

Issue Date

2005

Type

Journal Article

Language

Keywords

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Alternative Title

Abstract

INTRODUCTION|For years, both individuals and businesses have used arbitration to resolve their disputes instead of resorting to the traditional court system. Arbitration provides a better choice for businesses because it is less adversarial than traditional litigation and as such, may help foster future business relationships. Another advantage is that arbitrators will likely be experts in the business field wherein the dispute arose. All of these factors make arbitration an attractive alternative to traditional litigation. The Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA") governs commercial arbitration by providing parties with guidelines and enforcement mechanisms for their arbitrated disputes. The FAA allows a party to force arbitration when an agreement exists and the other party is refusing to arbitrate, describes how an arbitrator is to be appointed, gives arbitrators the power to compel the attendance of witnesses, allows a party to confirm an arbitration award as a court judgment, and also allows for the vacation of an arbitration award in limited circumstances. Thus, even though arbitration is a form of alternative dispute resolution, the FAA ensures that arbitration has the same power and ability to decide cases as traditional court litigation....

Description

Citation

38 Creighton L. Rev. 661 (2004-2005)

Publisher

Creighton University School of Law

License

Journal

Volume

Issue

PubMed ID

DOI

ISSN

EISSN