Batson in Practice: What we have learned about Batson and peremptory challenges

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Authors
Melilli, Kenneth J.
Issue Date
1996
Type
Journal Article
Language
Keywords
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Alternative Title
Abstract
In the years since the Batson v. Kentucky, 106 S. Ct. 1712 (1986) decision was handed down, a number of developments have occurred. First, the Court has expanded the application of Batson beyond its original sphere and correspondingly made further inroads upon the previously impregnable realm of the peremptory challenge. Second, lower courts have had the opportunity, or perhaps task, of implementing Batson, refining Batson's general dictates about "prima facie case[s]" of discrimination and "neutral explanations." Third, and perhaps most interestingly, in cases in which Batson's requirement of "neutral explanations" has applied, we have been given a window into a previously secret arena; the thought processes of lawyers in the use of peremptory challenges. This article examines each of these developments.
Description
Citation
Kenneth J. Melilli, Batson in Practice: What We Have Learned About Batson and Peremptory Challenges, 71 Notre Dame L. Rev. 447 (1996).
Publisher
License
Copyright (c) 1996 Kenneth J. Melilli
Journal
Volume
Issue
PubMed ID
DOI
ISSN
EISSN